Aslani F, Omrani A, Feyzbakhsh M, Ghafari R, Sobuti F. Determining the Degree of Identification Differences in Anatomical Landmarks by Digital Cephalometric Radiography and Conventional Radiographic Technique Using Manual Tracing of Human Skulls. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2014; 24 (114) :36-43
URL:
http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-3928-fa.html
اصلانی فرزین، عمرانی علی رضا، فیض بخش مسعود، غفاری روشنک، ثبوتی فرهاد. مقایسه تفاوت لندمارک های آناتومیک دو تکنیک رادیوگرافی لترال سفالومتری دیجیتال و معمولی به روش ترسیم دستی در جمجمه های انسانی. مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مازندران. 1393; 24 (114) :36-43
URL: http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-3928-fa.html
چکیده: (7631 مشاهده)
Background and purpose: Digital radiography has led to many improvements in radiology.
Despite many advantages there are different ideas in determining anatomical landmarks which results in
some errors in cephalometric analyses. The aim of this study was to determine the degree of identification
differences of anatomical landmarks by conventional and digital lateral cephalometric techniques using
manual tracing of human skulls.
Material and Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 17 cases of human
skulls in which metal radiopaque markers were attached to 9 landmarks as follows: N, S, ANS, PNS, A,
B, Pog, the most inferior point of lower mandibular border, and Go. Conventional and digital lateral
cephalograms were obtained from each skull with and without markers. The two cephalograms without
markers were traced for landmarks by three orthodontists. Any difference between these landmarks and
those of cephalograms with markers, were recorded and analyzed by student t-test.
Results: The level of differences in S point was not statistically significant along both x and y
coordinates. The measurement differences for the ANS and PNS points obtained by both radiographic
methods were significant along the x coordinate but not significant along the y coordinate. Also, the
measurement differences for the most inferior point of lower mandibular border, A, B, and Go points
along both x and y coordinates were observed to be statistically significant. The measurement difference
obtained for the Pog point was significant along the y coordinate and non-significant along the x
coordinate.
Conclusion:The difference in landmark identification between the two digital and conventional
lateral cephalometric techniques was statistically significant for some points on both dimensions,
however, the difference was not clinically significant.
نوع مطالعه:
پژوهشي-کامل |