Volume 30, Issue 183 (4-2020)                   J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2020, 30(183): 53-61 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Dadgar S, Armin M, Namdar P, Yazdani Charati J, Koohi Z. Shear Bond Strength of Metallic and Ceramic Brackets Bonded with Two-step and Three-step Light Cure Adhesives. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2020; 30 (183) :53-61
URL: http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-13832-en.html
Abstract:   (2173 Views)
  Background and purpose: The bonding process is highly important in orthodontic treatment for its fast speed. The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of ceramic and metallic brackets between three stage (transbondTM XT) and two stage (GC ortho connectTM) light cure composites.
Materials and methods: In this experimental study, 80 maxillary and mandibular first and second premolar teeth, extracted for the purpose of orthodontic treatment, were randomly divided into four groups (n=20 per group). All teeth were etched using 35% phosphoric acid. They were then bonded with metallic brackets with GC ortho connectTM composite (group I), and TransbondTM XT composite (group II), and ceramic brackets with GC ortho connectTM composite (group III) and TransbondTM XT composite (group IV). The shear bond strength of the brackets was measured by universal testing machine 24 hours after thermocycling and mounting procedures. The amount of resin remained on the tooth surface was determined by stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by SPSS V22 applying Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance.
Results: The average shear bond strength in groups I, II, III, and IV were 18.71±1.99, 19.82±8.75, 18.4±5.78, and 18.5±52.42 MPa, indicating no significant differences between the groups studied (P> 0.05). Also, we found no significant differences in adhesive remnant index (ARI) between all groups (P=0.641).
Conclusion: The shear bond strength of GC ortho connectTM composite was similar to that of the TransbondTM XT composite in both metallic and ceramic brackets. Therefore, GC ortho connectTM can serve as a substitute for TransbondTM XT.
Full-Text [PDF 608 kb]   (1010 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research(Original) | Subject: Dentistry

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb